I think it is possible to abuse awareness of narrative. I have noted it is a form leadership to help those who are less aware and in control of their self-definition to create positive identities and attribute positive meaning to events. However, we must be careful to not abuse our power to affect the creation of narrative, which is at the same time creation of self, which others engage in. People create their own realities, create their own system of attributing meaning, and attribute their own individual meaning to specific events. Just as we can step into that process and try to help direct it in times where it is beneficial, we can also step in and manipulate this process to the detriment of the individual.
When we recognize and become aware of our creation of narrative, we become aware of the different ways other people have of doing the same. And if they create an understanding that is different than the one we have, if they attribute different meaning to an event than we would, we could attempt to do something to disabuse people of their way of understanding things. What we are doing, in essence, is forcefully removing people from their created narrative, their created world, the world in which they are God whether they are awake to that fact or not, and we place them instead in the world we have created for ourselves.
We force our understandings, our attributions of meaning, onto other people. We destroy their worlds, we destroy their realities. We enslave them to our narrative, and we become a tyrant rather than simply the God of ourselves. Through the forceful authorship of their life, we become the antithesis of a Creator. We become the antithesis of a God. We become an enslaver of men, a destroyer of worlds, a conceptual equivalent of Satan. Do not take these religious terms out of context. I mean merely for the conceptual connotations to apply, and in the narrow sense in which they are metaphorical for the process I am speaking of. God is a narrative tool that many are familiar with, and it is a narrative that I am attempting to tap into in order to explain my ideas.
Forced Appropriation
Side note aside, think about all the destructive people who engage in this forced appropriation of identity creation. When we think of abusive husbands, boyfriends, girlfriends, wives, or parents, we see that they do exactly what I am discussing. They force you into their narrative. Their vision and understanding of you becomes your vision and understanding of yourself. Rather than you actively creating your own identity, you relinquish that power to them. And a very subtle and vulgar thing begins to happen. In order to improve your vision of yourself, it becomes necessary that you improve your tyrant’s vision of you. Your self-worth, your identity, becomes completely in someone else’s hands. You strive and you strive, hoping and praying for some show of affection or approval from your tyrant because that is the only way that you can incorporate positive understanding into your narrative.
Side note aside, think about all the destructive people who engage in this forced appropriation of identity creation. When we think of abusive husbands, boyfriends, girlfriends, wives, or parents, we see that they do exactly what I am discussing. They force you into their narrative. Their vision and understanding of you becomes your vision and understanding of yourself. Rather than you actively creating your own identity, you relinquish that power to them. And a very subtle and vulgar thing begins to happen. In order to improve your vision of yourself, it becomes necessary that you improve your tyrant’s vision of you. Your self-worth, your identity, becomes completely in someone else’s hands. You strive and you strive, hoping and praying for some show of affection or approval from your tyrant because that is the only way that you can incorporate positive understanding into your narrative.
I think the concept of enslavement, the danger and power of narrative control, are not merely hyperbole and rhetorical flourish. You can become both literally and figuratively the servant of another if you allow them to appropriate control of your narrative. And once they have control, it is extremely hard to win it back. That is why in some ways the bond of an abusive relationship can be stronger and more lasting than the bond of equality. For when both parties are allowed to create themselves, to create their own narratives, their narratives can diverge. But in an abusive relationship, there is only one narrative of understanding, and that is controlled by only one party. So the narratives cannot be disentangled unless the enslaved party awakens to the Creator within themselves and recognizes that they can differentiate their narrative, their reality, from their tyrant’s.
The problem starts with awareness. Because people are unaware of their own process of creating narrative they are unaware when that power is appropriated by someone else. The perfect slave is one who does not even know he is enslaved. As slumbering Gods, not yet conscious of our own powers, we are susceptible to enslavement. If all we do is live in our reality, and do not recognize that we create it at the same time, how are we supposed to recognize a reality which is created by ourselves and a reality which is created by another? Unconscious of our own creative powers, we can do nothing but accept the reality and narratives which are fed to us. We do not question the source of what we don’t understand. It is our tendency to take things as mere facts, rather than effects in an equation which necessarily must have a cause.
Yet once we are awakened, once we are aware, we gain the power of manipulation. We realize that we can manipulate others’ narratives. When we recognize the narratives that other people are using to understand events and themselves, we can do subtle things to shift that narrative slightly. I have discussed that this can be done to shift people’s narratives away from detrimental paths and towards positive paths. But it can be done to accomplish the opposite. Yet even if we mean well, we must understand how easy it is to become a devil rather than a God, a destroyer rather than a creator. There can be no sense of entitlement, we must shy away from any feeling that because we have gained control over our own self-creation, that our heightened awareness gives us the right to create others.
For if we appropriate the creation of identity from other individuals, even if we do so because we think that we will do a better job of it consciously than they will do of it unconsciously and unaware, we stunt their growth. We diminish them into something less. We kill the God within them. We must nurture the ultimate power of creation, the creation of self, in other people. We must pave the way for them to find the God within themselves, to awake to greater awareness, and learn their capacity for active self-definition. Expanding our creative powers outside of our own creation of self entails the creation of other Creators, other conscious self-definers, other aware creators of narrative, other Gods. And that can never be done by taking over the creation process for them, by implanting other people into our world of created meaning. No matter how positive and well-meaning your reality is, other people can be nothing but slaves there. Aware, or unaware, people must create for themselves. They are better off as slumbering Gods then slaves. Our duty, once we become aware, is to engender that awareness in others. Empowering is creation, paternalism merely gentle destruction.
Helping Hand
Does this mean that I should abandon my actions to foster positive narrative creation in others? It is an interesting question, but I would like to defend its continuation. For, I am merely providing another event which they can unconsciously or consciously choose to incorporate into their narrative. If I choose to add events to other people’s lives which are more likely to help them create positive narratives, that is perfectly acceptable thing to do. Say I texted a friend something positive because I fear she may have misunderstood some interaction we had. Choice still remains and the possibility of awakening remains as well. She could create any meaning she wished out of my actions, I simply tailored my response to be one that I thought more likely to be incorporated a certain way. Furthermore, I was directly addressing how my own actions should be understood by her.
Does this mean that I should abandon my actions to foster positive narrative creation in others? It is an interesting question, but I would like to defend its continuation. For, I am merely providing another event which they can unconsciously or consciously choose to incorporate into their narrative. If I choose to add events to other people’s lives which are more likely to help them create positive narratives, that is perfectly acceptable thing to do. Say I texted a friend something positive because I fear she may have misunderstood some interaction we had. Choice still remains and the possibility of awakening remains as well. She could create any meaning she wished out of my actions, I simply tailored my response to be one that I thought more likely to be incorporated a certain way. Furthermore, I was directly addressing how my own actions should be understood by her.
Understanding that my actions could be misunderstood and attributed detrimental meaning, I acted to bring harmony between her narrative and mine. Where our narratives crossed and connected, I wanted there to be harmony, in sync vibration, rather than discord. I wasn’t working to force her into my own vision of her. I was working to have her incorporate an accurate understanding of how I viewed her, and hoped that this would be beneficial in how she viewed herself. I was attempting to have our narratives feed each other positive energy.
The positive energy that I felt from doing something beneficial for her, the positive energy I felt from the necessary flow of affection towards her this created, the positive energy I felt from feeling that she understood the truth of how I viewed her. The positive energy this created in me, as it interacted with the positive energy I think it engendered in her, created a positive momentum in the flow of both our narratives. The interaction of our narratives worked to the mutual benefit of the trajectory of our individual self-creation. But I realize that the greater gift I could have given is to teach her, or anybody, to become aware of their own power of self-creation. Of course this takes time, and extended contact, so it is not a viable option at all times. Those who I have great access to, those who are open to hearing how I view things, people who have a chance to interact with my ideas, those are the people who can see whether or not my ideas hold power for them. It is not important they think of things with the same terms and words I used, as long as they recognize that they have an active role to play in a process which until that point they had only been a passive participant. Whatever framework, narrative, or means they use to understand that process and their role in it is inconsequential. If they choose to understand their role completely differently, that is just as well. At least then, they are creating. To dismiss my ideas and replace them with something else is the very essence of actively creating your own unique reality and self-definition. Simply by engaging with my ideas, dismissing them can only be done consciously and with awareness. And that is all I wish for.
Profound Potential
The more awakened Gods there are the more people there are who will actively work to bring about harmony of narratives. This harmony feeds positivity to the narratives of both individuals, and it becomes a flow of positivity which encompasses both narratives. Each narrative is individual, each individual a self-creator, but together they can consciously collaborate to build something which is even greater than either individually. Yet because they are still a part of what they create, each individual creates for themselves something greater. As more awake to the Creator within themselves, and learn to live as both the Creator and the created, that flow of positivity becomes a stream, and then a river, and then a tidal wave. Working together, consciously bringing harmony to our narratives, feeding off each other’s conscious, positive creation of self, what happy reality could we create? What beauty could we infuse into the world we create? Together our narratives would sing, our voices joining together in a chorus of joy to brighten the collective story that is the human existence.
The more awakened Gods there are the more people there are who will actively work to bring about harmony of narratives. This harmony feeds positivity to the narratives of both individuals, and it becomes a flow of positivity which encompasses both narratives. Each narrative is individual, each individual a self-creator, but together they can consciously collaborate to build something which is even greater than either individually. Yet because they are still a part of what they create, each individual creates for themselves something greater. As more awake to the Creator within themselves, and learn to live as both the Creator and the created, that flow of positivity becomes a stream, and then a river, and then a tidal wave. Working together, consciously bringing harmony to our narratives, feeding off each other’s conscious, positive creation of self, what happy reality could we create? What beauty could we infuse into the world we create? Together our narratives would sing, our voices joining together in a chorus of joy to brighten the collective story that is the human existence.
















